Atsep.app

Developer Handover Inspection – Developer Variant

Developer Variant is a tool created specifically for real estate developers handing over units to buyers. It combines technical inspection features with a formal process of recording and verifying reported defects. Designed for developers who need professional documentation of handover meetings and a clear division of responsibility.
The inspection report is generated in DOCX or PDF format with the option of an electronic signature from both parties – the developer and the client. Each defect can be marked as valid or invalid, with the option to add a response for the client.

For developers who care about client relationships

The application was designed with the unit handover process in mind – from the first meeting with the client, through recording observations, to the formal signing of handover documents. It works equally well for individual handovers and mass handovers in large developments.
  • 🏢 real estate developers handing over apartments and houses
  • 📋 handover coordinators in sales offices
  • 🏗 real estate project managers
  • 👔 developer representatives during handover protocols
  • 🏘 companies managing the warranty process in developments

How does Developer differ from the Basic variant?

✅ Basic Variant

Simple technical inspection – you register defects reported by the client, take photos, generate a report and hand it over. No option for verification or formal signature.

🏢 Developer Variant

Formal inspection process – you record the client’s observations, verify the validity of each defect, add responses, generate a protocol and collect signatures from both parties. Full documentation compliant with the developer agreement.

How does a property handover inspection work in the Developer variant?

📸 Recording client observations

During the inspection with the client you document the observations and defects they report – adding photos and descriptions directly in the application.

✔️ Validity verification

Each reported defect can be marked as valid or invalid – making it clear what requires repair and what was a misunderstanding.

💬 Adding responses

You can add a response or comment to each defect – an explanation for the client, a repair deadline, information about the finish standard.

✍️ Signature from both parties

After the inspection is complete, both parties sign the protocol – the developer and the client. Electronic signature directly in the application or a traditional signature on a printout.

📄 Handover protocol

You generate a formal handover protocol in DOCX or PDF format – a ready document compliant with the requirements of the developer agreement.

📊 Summary report

You see statistics: how many defects were reported, how many were deemed valid, how many require repair – a complete picture of the inspection meeting.

Practical use scenarios for property handover inspections

🏠 Apartment inspection by the buyer You meet the client in the new apartment. During the walkthrough they report 12 observations. You document each one with a photo and description. After finishing, you review the list together: you mark 8 defects as valid (requiring repair), 4 as invalid (e.g. misunderstanding of the finish standard). You add explanations for the client to the invalid ones. Both parties sign the protocol. The client receives a copy, you keep the original in the archive. 📅 Mass handovers in a development Over the course of a week you hand over 15 apartments. You document each inspection in the application. After the week you have a complete set of 15 signed protocols; statistics show that the most common observations concerned bathroom grout – you pass the information on to the finishing crew. All documents organised, ready for archiving. ⚖️ Resolving warranty disputes A client reports a defect 6 months later. You return to the inspection protocol – you check whether they reported it during the inspection, what response they received, whether they signed the protocol accepting the condition. Full documentation allows you to clearly establish responsibility and the scope of the warranty.

Why do verification and signatures matter?

⭐ The signature of both parties is formal confirmation of the unit’s condition – the client cannot add new defects later ⭐ Validity verification protects against unjustified claims and resolves misunderstandings ⭐ Responses to defects document what the developer committed to repair and by when ⭐ A signed protocol is a legally binding document – not just an ordinary note

Benefits for the developer

⚖️ Legal protection A signed protocol is evidence in case of a dispute. The client confirmed the condition of the unit – they cannot later claim that “it was like that from the start, but I didn’t report it”. 📊 Transparent process Every inspection documented in the same way. The client knows what to expect. The developer has uniform standards for handing over units. 💼 Professional image Electronic protocols, signatures, responses to observations – the client sees that the process is organised and serious. This builds trust in the developer. 📂 Easy archiving All protocols in one place, in digital form. No need to search through binders – everything at hand when a client submits a complaint. ⏱ Time savings Instead of manually writing protocols and scanning signatures, you do everything in the application. From the meeting with the client to the finished document – a matter of minutes. ✅ Clear commitments Marking defects as valid and responses specifying repair deadlines – both the client and the service team know exactly what needs to be done and when.

Who is it especially for?

The Developer Variant was created with real estate developers in mind who:
  • hand over dozens or hundreds of units and need a unified process
  • want to have legally binding protocols with signatures from both parties
  • need to verify the validity of reported defects before committing to repair
  • require documentation for warranty processes and dispute resolution
  • care about a professional image and a transparent inspection process
  • want to avoid documentation chaos and have all protocols in a digital archive